FINKSBURG PLANNING AREA COUNCIL, INC.

P.O. BOX. 70

FINKSBURG, MARYLAND, 21048

 

 

November 9, 2004

 

RE: Finksburg Plan and Proposed Employment Campus

 

To all Finksburg Residents,

 

By now some of you may be aware that at their Nov. 8, 2004 workshop the Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission members recommended that planners scrap the proposed location for an employment campus adjacent to the Gerstell Academy on Md. 140, because of strong community opposition, concerns over site access and possible environmental impact.  County planners were urged to find alternate locations for the employment campus.  Additionally, the Commissioners instructed the planners to come up with a list of desirable qualities and recommendations for what requirements the new employment campus would need.  Commission members would determine which criteria are most important for an employment campus zone, such as access to public water and sewer or proximity to a major road, after the list is prepared for them and the benefit of planners.

 

Members of the Finksburg Planning Area Council, Inc. (FPAC) and many Finksburg residents opposed the original employment campus location because of the lack of public utilities in the Finksburg area and the potential impact a 150-acre plus development would have on the Liberty Reservoir and the surrounding Finksburg community.  Many property owners where upset that their property values would be eroded by such an employment campus being developed in that area and had grave concerns for their wells and septic systems failing.  The employment campus would have approached the border of the North Branch of the Patapsco River a main tributary to the Liberty Reservoir Watershed.

 

 

 

 

RE: Finksburg Plan and Proposed Employment Campus

 

 

The Commission also instructed the planners to consider the adoption of the entire Finksburg Plan that encompasses the entire 4th Election District rather than just the Finksburg Corridor Plan.  Commission members were concerned that property owners had not been officially contacted regarding any proposed property rezonings in the 4th. ED.  The planners were instructed to contact all property owners that could be affected.  Members of the Finksburg Planning Council have long supported the adoption of the entire Finksburg Plan (last approved in 1981) so that it would more truly reflect the views and desires of the citizens of Finksburg.  [Over 17,000 people live in the Finksburg area and have no official voice in Carroll County since they are not an incorporated municipality.  FPAC has long been the only voice for Finksburg to Carroll County government and now enjoys a seat at the Carroll County Council of Governments.]  FPAC strongly voiced its opinion that all property owners needed to be notified before any vote would take place on rezonings.  Having an opportunity for open meetings in Carroll County has long been a concern of FPAC.  It only makes common sense to inform citizens before things are done by government.

 

While now it would appear that the P&Z Commissioners as well as the Board of County Commissioners are listening to FPAC and Finksburg’s citizens, we all must maintain a constant vigilance as well as increased public participation in this most important planning process for all of Finksburg.  FPAC urges your continued support and communication during the immediate future regarding the Finksburg Plan.  Keep up the involvement that you have shown.  Now is the time for all of Finksburg’s citizens to speak.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

John Lopez

President

www.finksburg.org